Social Control and Multiple Discovery in Science: The Opiate by Susan E. Cozzens
By Susan E. Cozzens
Acceptance for accomplishment is a huge institutional present within the clinical group, hence regulating disputes over credits for discovery, should be seen as a major challenge in social keep watch over. Cozzens examines a well known dispute—one that happened with the invention of the opiate receptor in neuropharmacological learn. the problems Cozens discusses—priority disputes, social regulate, and norms and morals—are vital in the course of the sciences; they're the most important components within the lives of scientists, the functioning of clinical groups, and the day by day operations of clinical companies.
Read or Download Social Control and Multiple Discovery in Science: The Opiate Receptor Case PDF
Best research books
This thorough revision of Babbie's standard-setting e-book offers a succinct, user-friendly advent to the sphere of study equipment as practiced through social scientists. modern examples+such as terrorism, Alzheimer's affliction, anti-gay prejudice and schooling, and the legalization of marijuana make this Fourth version completely attention-grabbing because it introduces you to the "how-tos" and "whys" of social examine equipment.
The fairway functionality has performed a key position within the analytical process that during fresh years has resulted in vital advancements within the research of stochastic approaches with jumps. during this study be aware, the authors-both considered as prime specialists within the box- gather a number of precious effects derived from the development of the golf green functionality and its estimates.
Within the Preface to the 3rd quantity, we defined the evolution of this sequence and the alterations that experience taken position within the box because the first quantity seemed. The contents of the present quantity proceed the com mitment to a widely dependent viewpoint on learn regarding con sciousness and self-regulation which used to be embodied within the earlier 3 volumes.
- New Frontiers of Multidisciplinary Research in STEAM-H (Science, Technology, Engineering, Agriculture, Mathematics, and Health)
- Project Scheduling: A Research Handbook (International Series in Operations Research & Management Science)
- The Visual Language of Technique: Volume 2 - Heritage and Expectations in Research
- Recreational Uses of Coastal Areas: A Research Project of the Commission on the Coastal Environment, International Geographical Union
- Limbic and Autonomic Nervous Systems Research
Extra info for Social Control and Multiple Discovery in Science: The Opiate Receptor Case
Publisher : State University of New York Press isbn10 | asin : 0887069363 print isbn13 : 9780887069369 ebook isbn13 : 9780585090467 language : English subject Endorphins--Receptors--Research--Social aspects, Research--Social aspects, Science--Social aspects. 72 subject : Endorphins--Receptors--Research--Social aspects, Research--Social aspects, Science--Social aspects. Page i Social Control and Multiple Discovery in Science Page ii SUNY Series in Science, Technology, and Society Sal Restivo, Editor Page iii Social Control and Multiple Discovery in Science The Opiate Receptor Case Susan E.
When priority disputes are seen as a problem in social control, an array of questions that appear in the literature on multiple discovery are highlighted. The three sets taken up in this bookthose dealing with the issues in priority disputes, "third parties," and moral responseare introduced briefly in the remainder of this chapter, then explored at greater length in chapters 2 and 3. Readers who are primarily interested in the opiate receptor story, rather than how my analysis of it fits into the literature on multiple discovery or social control, might want to use this Page 5 chapter as an introduction, then skip to chapter 4, where the case study begins.
For Andrew Schally's team, the structure to be determined was of TRH, thyrotropin releasing hormone. Both teams were clear that they were after the same information; the differences in terms expressed differences in interpretation of previous results. The puzzle, in each case, came down to the question of which one of a number of possible amino acid sequences was the right one. The race had been on for several years when, in January of 1969, the number of possible structures was drastically reduced by results announced by Guillemin's group.