Personality Politics?: The Role of Leader Evaluations in by Marina Costa Lobo, John Curtis
By Marina Costa Lobo, John Curtis
Personality Politics? assesses the position that citizens' perceptions and reviews of leaders play in democratic elections. The e-book offers facts from an array of nations with various ancient and institutional contexts, and employs leading edge methodologies to figure out the significance of leaders in democracies worldwide.
Addressing such questions as 'Where do leaders results come from?', 'In which institutional contexts are chief results extra important?' and, 'To which types of citizens are leaders a extra in demand issue for vote casting behaviour?', the authors search to figure out no matter if the jobs leaders play complements or damages the electoral method, and what influence this has at the caliber of democracy in electoral democracies this present day.
Read Online or Download Personality Politics?: The Role of Leader Evaluations in Democratic Elections PDF
Similar elections books
In a few years elections result in enduring alterations to the yankee political scene. In 2006, a pivotal election 12 months, the Republicans suffered a convincing defeat, wasting the home and Senate for the 1st time because the 1994 "Republican Revolution. " yet what brought on this pivotal shift? Fault strains presents either a wealth of perception concerning what occurred within the 2006 congressional elections and a framework to help in figuring out the potential value of the 2006 consequence for next advancements in American politics.
"Barack Obama got here into place of work in the course of one of many worst monetary crises in American background and needed to extract the USA from grinding international wars. He succeeded in enacting the main revolutionary legislative schedule because the nice Society years, and has pivoted American international coverage towards East Asia.
The ebook extends learn at the territorial constitution of celebration structures (party nationalization) to twenty post-communist democracies. It explains social gathering nationalisation because of ethnically orientated politics, and exhibits how celebration nationalisation can bring up our figuring out of electoral platforms.
On September 23, 1947, the Plaza de Mayo in Buenos Aires packed with jubilant women and men celebrating a brand new legislation that gave girls an analogous correct as males to vote in all elections. President Juan Domingo Perón had completed a big victory for his regime. within the years that undefined, Perón, with the aid of his spouse, Evita, courted woman electorate and created possibilities for them to take part in his broad-based political coalition.
- Navigating Public Opinion: Polls, Policy, and the Future of American Democracy
- Mandate Politics
- The Front-Loading Problem in Presidential Nominations
- Political Marketing and the 2015 UK General Election
- Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe
- American Political Leaders
Extra resources for Personality Politics?: The Role of Leader Evaluations in Democratic Elections
The “conservative label”, for example, should be a more salient cue in a field of candidates in which one is a conservative and the rest are moderates and liberals’ (1981, 433). These findings support others who suggest that the act of comparison is key. Rahn et al. (1990) run their candidate models in two ways: first, separately for each candidate; and second, using comparative scores for judgements. They find that the comparative model is more accurate and suggest that ‘the entire judgemental process appears to be comparative’ (1990, 119).
2001). See McDonald, Mendes, and Kim 2007 for a review of these efforts. My analysis makes use of Benoit and Laver’s (2007) extensive work, which maps parties along two dimensional lines: stances on social liberalism and on taxes versus spending. I categorized parties according to their placement along these two dimensions, grouping parties with similar locations into the same group or category. Party categories included ‘Conservative’ (including the Canadian Conservatives, the American Republicans, the British Conservatives, the German CDU and CSU, the Australian Liberals, and the Swedish Moderate Party); ‘Centre-Left’ (including the Canadian Liberals, British Labour, New Zealand Labour, Australian Labour, the German SPD, and the US Democratic party); ‘Left’ (which includes the Canadian NDP, the Swedish Left Party, the New Zealand Alliance, the British Liberal Democrats, and the Australian Democrats); ‘Centre-Right’ (which includes the Swedish Centre Party, the New Zealand National Party, New Zealand ACT, the Swedish Peoples Party, and the German FDP); ‘Right’ (which includes New Zealand First, Australian ONE, Australian Nationals, Swedish Christian, Swedish NDP, and the Canadian Reform Party); ‘Green’ (which includes the Swedish, Canadian, New Zealand, Australian, and German Green Parties); and ‘Sectional’ (which includes the Canadian Bloc Quebecois, the Scottish National Party, and the Welsh Plaid Cymru).
Some suggest that leaders play an important role in the vote calculus, while others argue that in comparison to other factors (such as partisanship and the economy), perceptions of leaders have only a minimal effect. There is also substantial disagreement about how it is that voters actually evaluate candidates in the first place. Scholars have reached very different conclusions about the types of factors that influence voters’ evaluations of leaders. Existing studies point to divergent sets of factors, including voter demographics (Cutler 2002), partisanship and ideology (Bartels 2002; Graetz and McAllister 1987), and policy/issue related factors (Rusk and Weisberg 1972; Weisberg and Rusk 1970).