Choosing Students: Higher Education Admissions Tools for the by Jacky Lumby, Wayne J. Camara, Gary Crowe, Ernest W. Kimmel,

By Jacky Lumby, Wayne J. Camara, Gary Crowe, Ernest W. Kimmel, Petros Pashiardis

This quantity brings various views to endure at the factor of ways greater schooling associations can - or should still - decide upon scholars throughout the early a part of the twenty first century. a few of the participants record on examine to increase and validate power instruments to help these answerable for admission judgements. different participants, despite the fact that, pose broader questions about the character of selective admissions, approximately institutional responses to the altering demography of these trying to input better schooling, or in regards to the applicable standards of 'success' in better schooling. the amount is very well timed as the query of ways adjustments in admission instruments and approaches will have an effect on campus variety following the new preferrred court docket choice about the collage of Michigan. range is a crucial main issue of the entire participants and the bankruptcy via Lee Bollinger--President at Michigan on the time the proceedings have been filed--is relatively proper. This ebook brings jointly the study that underlies numerous proposed techniques to bettering the choice of scholars. supplying aid for the integrity of the admissions approach and the validity of recent instruments to aid the next schooling establishment to pick a various pupil physique, this e-book explores the results of the evaluation component to K-12 institution reform for better schooling admissions practices. the varied contributions to this quantity replicate the present ferment in academic learn and academic perform as associations of upper schooling search to increase a brand new admissions paradigm for coming a long time following the collage of Michigan judgements. This e-book is meant for these leaders and pros who set admission guidelines and practices in American faculties, and graduate colleges, in addition to for these students and scientists who learn, enhance, and validate instruments to be used within the strategy of identifying scholars in ways in which are congruent with an institution's undertaking, values, and targets.

Show description

Read or Download Choosing Students: Higher Education Admissions Tools for the 21st Century PDF

Similar education books

Linux For Dummies, 6th Edition

Past versions of Linux For Dummies have garnered rave reports. in spite of the fact that, there’s one frightening time period utilized to them—outdated! The sixth variation treatments that with easy-to-understand details at the newest model of the most well-liked Linux distributions, together with Fedora middle, SuSE, Mandrake, Xandros, Linspire, and Knoppix.

Text and Artifact in the Religions of Mediterranean Antiquity: Essays in Honour of Peter Richardson (Studies in Christianity and Judaism, ESCJ 9)

Can archaeological continues to be be made to “speak” whilst introduced into conjunction with texts? Can written is still, on stone or papyrus, make clear the parables of Jesus, or at the Jewish view of afterlife? What are the boundaries to using artifactual info, and whilst is the price overstated? textual content and Artifact addresses the complicated and exciting factor of ways basic non secular texts from the traditional Mediterranean international are illuminated by means of, and in flip light up, the ever-increasing volume of artifactual proof to be had from the encompassing global.

Women and Terrorism: Female Activity in Domestic and International Terror Groups (Comtemporary Terrorism Studies)

This e-book examines the connection among girls and terrorist actions within the post-World struggle II period. using comparative examine into 26 terrorist firms world-wide, the paintings identifies a dichotomy wherein girls are considerably extra energetic in family terrorist firms than in foreign teams.

Choosing Students: Higher Education Admissions Tools for the 21st Century

This quantity brings numerous views to undergo at the factor of ways larger schooling associations can - or should still - decide on scholars through the early a part of the twenty first century. a number of the individuals file on study to improve and validate capability instruments to aid these answerable for admission judgements.

Additional resources for Choosing Students: Higher Education Admissions Tools for the 21st Century

Example text

An Institution Should Read as Many Individual Applications as Possible. This guideline follows directly from guideline 5. Reading applications is labor intensive and therefore expensive, but it is also the way to make the bestinformed decisions possible, and it engages admissions officers, faculty, and other readers in important and valuable ways. Perhaps most important, reading individual applications is the cornerstone of an admission process that considers race and ethnicity following the O'Connor opinion in Grutter v.

Bollinger (2003). It is fundamentally important to such reading processes that (a) there be careful training and norming of readers, (b) that such training continue throughout the reading process, (c) that individual reader outcomes be tracked 24 LAIRD and adjusted where necessary, and (d) that the entire process be carefully evaluated when it is completed. Every application should be read by at least two different readers, and the second reader must not know the evaluation (s) or score (s) assigned by the first reader.

In addition, students who are really computer savvy can produce their own documentation and make it look remarkably authentic. Lying about personal and family circumstances is also an area of vulnerability for selective institutions, especially in states that have ended affirmative action in their public universities—California, Florida, and Washington. In these states, admissions policies tend to place even heavier emphasis on socioeconomic disadvantage and other kinds of hardship than when affirma- 2.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.35 of 5 – based on 42 votes